Link. Or a way we can access other than screenshots.
We need to further understand what lab is testing, their credibility, and examine how authentic and trusted they are. I don't doubt the screenshots are legit, but I want to examine the lab.
Appears to be a collective of tests posted to a domain which allows users to create subdomains.
I just ordered a 800 Euro lot. I'll have it all tested and post back. That's the only sure way to know.
After the China bust, Primo is in short supply due to raw materials. Test is super easy to make so no suprise that would pass. NPP should be cheap as well, but I will follow up.
I made my tests already and came good, yes it is true they had few bad batches. Some batches were slightly underdosed, but still within an acceptable range and limits.
I made my tests already and came good, yes it is true they had few bad batches. Some batches were slightly underdosed, but still within an acceptable range and limits.
Well okay, no1 is forcing you to buy from them, alr would be fair to sent where did you made the test and prove that the tests are legit. I can make this screen via AI in 2 minutes.
The website does not appear trustworthy for several reasons:
No verifiable data – There are no actual lab results shown, no sample IDs, no test dates, and no laboratory names or methods. It only displays empty categories or “0 results.”
No transparency – The site does not mention who runs it, what organization or lab is behind it, or how the data were collected.
Free web hosting – It’s hosted on Neocities, a free website platform. While not inherently bad, it’s not a professional or secure host for scientific data.
No accreditation or certification – Legitimate lab reports always reference accredited labs (ISO/IEC 17025, for example), and include traceable documentation. None of that is visible here.
Unverifiable claims – If it claims to show “lab test results,” there’s no evidence of authenticity or validation.
In short: the page looks like a personal or prototype project rather than a verified database of laboratory results. Without clear authorship, methodology, or verifiable documents, it should not be considered a reliable source.
The website does not appear trustworthy for several reasons:
No verifiable data – There are no actual lab results shown, no sample IDs, no test dates, and no laboratory names or methods. It only displays empty categories or “0 results.”
No transparency – The site does not mention who runs it, what organization or lab is behind it, or how the data were collected.
Free web hosting – It’s hosted on Neocities, a free website platform. While not inherently bad, it’s not a professional or secure host for scientific data.
No accreditation or certification – Legitimate lab reports always reference accredited labs (ISO/IEC 17025, for example), and include traceable documentation. None of that is visible here.
Unverifiable claims – If it claims to show “lab test results,” there’s no evidence of authenticity or validation.
In short: the page looks like a personal or prototype project rather than a verified database of laboratory results. Without clear authorship, methodology, or verifiable documents, it should not be considered a reliable source.
I agree, hosting it on a subdomain could make sense for privacy reasons. But there’s still no indication of which batch this refers to, no certificate, nothing verifiable. It’s just plain text with a random value and no proof behind it. I made my tests already and they came out good as I said above— yes, it’s true they had a few bad batches, The Driada staff themselves already acknowledged this and said the same thing, as far as I know. Some were slightly underdosed, but still within an acceptable range and limits. You’ll see what you get in your tests, make sure to post them here.
Batch number ?
Lab name ?
Lab analysis , not only "good//bad"?
Date?
Pictures ?
Sorry but there are multiple lab tests from different peds from driada , made by different labs and people and they're on point ... Same with blood works .
Not to run away from the discussion but just because coming screaming as if Santa Claus existed or that the end of the world is near with a sign around your neck without proof or valid argument has no meaning and no value here (except that of making those who believe in this look like fools in the eyes of those who have enough neurons to have a minimum of cerebral thinking)
You just have to see that on these screenshots 23 tests out of 23 from another supplier are good to understand the meaning of this intervention...
Reactions: RyoushiYukiWe need to further understand what lab is testing, their credibility, and examine how authentic and trusted they are. I don't doubt the screenshots are legit, but I want to examine the lab.
Reactions: Eugen and Falcon
Reactions: xccdfA response from Driada would be nice.
Reactions: Falcon and fluffyde
Reactions: xccdfI just ordered a 800 Euro lot. I'll have it all tested and post back. That's the only sure way to know.
After the China bust, Primo is in short supply due to raw materials. Test is super easy to make so no suprise that would pass. NPP should be cheap as well, but I will follow up.
Reactions: Hanz
Reactions: fluffydeIn short: the page looks like a personal or prototype project rather than a verified database of laboratory results. Without clear authorship, methodology, or verifiable documents, it should not be considered a reliable source.
Reactions: blerj, Donvitosharkone and christofgrIm going to test everything I got and what my friend has. We will report back.
Reactions: Falcon, fluffyde, Hanz and 1 other personNothing to say here… seems like
Reactions: Lord Trenner and Hanz
Reactions: Eugen and fluffydeLab name ?
Lab analysis , not only "good//bad"?
Date?
Pictures ?
Sorry but there are multiple lab tests from different peds from driada , made by different labs and people and they're on point ... Same with blood works .
Reactions: Hanz
Reactions: Driadashop and christofgrNot to run away from the discussion but just because coming screaming as if Santa Claus existed or that the end of the world is near with a sign around your neck without proof or valid argument has no meaning and no value here (except that of making those who believe in this look like fools in the eyes of those who have enough neurons to have a minimum of cerebral thinking)
You just have to see that on these screenshots 23 tests out of 23 from another supplier are good to understand the meaning of this intervention...
Reactions: luuda and Hanz